Ultimate shoulder rides

I love sitting on an other man with my full weight and totally ignore him and ignore his pain, and then after a long time when he begs me to stand up, I slap him and order him to shut up then just keep sitting on him. I also make him give me a feet massage while I am on top of him and while he is totally exhausted.

Last edited by LionRider (2023-09-01 15:08:34)

esel wrote:

@lionrider


You require foot massage from the person while sitting on him. I therefore suppose that you are sitting on his belly, while  leaning on his thighs as a backrest ? In this position you can give him access to your feet, either with his hands or tongue.

I don't see any other possibility ..

This position is VERY comfortable for the sitting person but very quickly painful for the seated one !!!  I wonder how long can they usually keep the position under you ?!

Please excuse my curiosity ! I'm just very interested by this position...

esel

My slave sits on his knees with his back straight. I sit on him my ass and thighs on his shoulders, with his hands he grabs my feet and massage them.

i too love to sit on a man and feel his struggle under me,

GeoffCouch wrote:

it can be just about intimacy and envelopment.

I was surprised and delighted today when a guy was sitting on my belly. I started to feel the pulse in my belly beating away and asked if he could feel it too, expecting that he couldn't.

Yes, he said, especially when I breathed out!

It feels so gratifying to be sharing that basic body function, especially through his arse!.

LionRider:                                                                                                                                 Your post reminds me of a  very dear friend of mine. He also loves sitting on other men in various ways  and  seems to enjoy  it more when the one  he is sitting on  isn't  under him willingly.  it's  quite amusing watching him sit on another  guy's chest and torment  the guy under him with little annoying type of slaps  and other harmless tortures.

Chest, belly, face, back ... a submissive body offers a lot of sitting opportunities ! Belly sitting is probably the most comfortable for the sitter, the underling lying on his back, his thighs raised so as to offer the sitter an adjustable backrest ... But yes very soon very painful ! This position seems to me to be quite appropriate for short breaks during a pleasurable shoulder-rides ... Sitting on the chest requires that the underling lies on a low bench, so as to offer an adequate sitting height, for instance during a lunch, or working at one's desk ... Chest-sitting may last for a very long time, because the underling can freely bretathe with his belly ... Sitting on the back also provides nice chair for working or eating sitters, but it won't last as long as the chest sitting .. Last the face sitting is probably the kinkiest way to use someone as a chair, the face being in fact the cushion of that chair ... If it is a fullweight sitting it won't last for long, unless the sitter now nd then allows her cushion to breathe, but with the help of a rimseat, or queening chair, it might last for hours and provide great satisfaction to both the sitter and the underling ....
Of course only masochist people will provide all these services ... But the sitter may enjoy all of them without being sadistic at all, but just selfish and opportunistic; i.e, qiite normal in fact !

Being sat on and ignored by the sitter is certainly a great satisfaction for the submissive, but being forgotten, as You quite rightly mentioned, sounds like some kind of unsurpassable achievement for both the sitter and the underling ! The sitter will somehow, sometime, remember what she had been sitting on, and probably find it quite normal, thus acknowledging Her natural superiority. The underling will see it as a proof of his inexistence as a human being, his perfect objectification. A painful experiene though, but his pain would be felt as a proof  that it was for the greatest pleasure and well-being of his  sitter ...

Equidum

I deeply sympathise with Your ex-husband ... The poor man must be daily mourning for his conjugal past, regretting his days under Your emotional yoke, especially those marvelous moments when You granted him the honour to serve You as a seat, in order perhaps to spice up even more the little or great joys of Your wealthy life ... Being now divorced from You perhaps didn't free him from his love, especially not from his "love to serve" You in all possible ways, as a seat, a horse, a toy, a slave ... which, all added together probably transmuted into some incurable addiction ... 

Well ... pure guesswork ... Am I wrong ?

If I understand correctly, Your husband loved You, but he was not submissive at all, or, at least, not in the way You wished ! So, You had to force him to be a seat, a pony, a toy, a slave ... Which forced You to be a permanent trainer, with, apparently, very little improvement as regards Your "pupil" ! I understand in those circumstances, that You got rid of it and of him simultaneously !
I wish You could find an appropriate replacement for this ex, someone like me, for instance
I seem to remember we have known each other in a "previous life" ...?! I'm still mourning for that enchanting daily life of  Yours, Your business, Your employees, Your neighbours, Your friends and family ... equidum928@gmail.com would be honoured if You granted him a personal message ...

Equidum

equidum:                                                                                                   
                                                                                                               
I realize  that  you and others might find my actions with my ex  to be cruel , but I was  treating him  that way almost from the start of our dating days  and after about six months  he  literally  begged me to marry him  and while I basically always dominated the men I dated, he represented a challenge and breaking him was   actually creative fun.   Of  course I  refused   his proposal  until I gave in  and  came up with an iron clad prenuptial agreement that was iron clad  and so  lopsided in my favor that I thought he would never go along with it.                                                      I was wrong about that.                                                                         

He  nearly  signed his life away  and to be  honest, there was a part of me  that really didn't want to give up having him under my thumb and while I  knew I would  divorce him  and enforce the  pre-nup, having this  big strong fool  at my disposal had it's appeal . Marital  fidelity  on my part wasn't  at all part of  our  pre-nup or  vows   so  I wasn't giving up anything  while  further  my financial future so for me  it was  a win/win situation.   If I hadn't included  the "open on my end only" clause in the marriage, I doubt our  marriage would have lasted even a year .                                                                          Please don't  get this wrong, I still dominated  the other men I dated. But many of them were masochistic and I used  them for  amusement. But  my nature  demands variety  and  sometimes I liked  much softer men and men that I could  really  physically dominate. A few I could  really pin down by just sitting on them.              But I never  allowed my husband  to know that they were not  equal sex partners.

equidum:                                                                                                   

That is a vary interesting perspective  and I do  expect that my ex  had a  masochistic streak that he  kept  buried  even from himself.      Once I met his family, I noticed  the machismo aspect of the family   but it  included something subtle  in all that testosterone  laden  facade.  There  was a certain  attitude  in his mother  that was so similar to my  mother  and  myself that I couldn't help  but notice.                    My mother was overt  and decidedly dominant  in  our  home while Ex's mother was far more subtle but  still made  it obvious that  She  was the one who was really in charge.  She used  certain  words and phrases  that most  males  wouldn't  notice  that   conveyed  dominance over her  husband and two sons.   Ex's father and   ex clearly  submitted to her  while  ex's  older brother   seemed to rebel  a bit  more. That older brother  BTW,  was also  the one who  interfered  in my  training of  ex.                                                                 

Other than humiliating  my ex and sitting on his face until he passed out or was close to passing out, I  rarely   caused him  physical pain.    I enjoyed exposing him to his prejudices ,most notably  plus-size  women  and  gay  or effeminate  men.  I loved  seeing my ex   seem to  shrink when I  brought home  a  straight but effeminate man and  brought him into  my  bedroom,   and since we are on the topic I often gave myself the fantasy of  having my  (then) husband tied up  so my effeminate date and I could  sit  on his chest and stomach and  ignore him while we  engaged  in overt  displays of affection .                The only thing that  prevented me from fulfilling this  amusement  and humiliation was  that  I  still dominated   all the men I brought home  and lied  to ex  about  what really took place in  my  bedroom.     

Since my social life only included  two  gay men , one of whom was an ex boyfriend  who wasn't "out of the closet" when we dated, flaunting  and  troubling  my ex  with that  aspect was only occurred once at my  annual Halloween party.                                                       

I don't know if straight men  have anything  equivalent to really enjoying  the  sexual  aspect of  dominance over a more  physically powerful person of either sex.  Straight  men are rather  guarded  about such  things  and  I often can't get them to expose  such aspects of their  private thoughts.

equidum: 

I do  believe my  mother was ahead of her time and  even from an early age  of his understanding, she made him understand that he had to obey me as well as her. My father was  submissive to her though  she  rarely  disciplined  him in any  physical manner.                               

Early in our development, I saw  boys  and men as  inferior, or at least  subservient  since my  brother wasn't allowed  to  fight back  when I pounced on him, often without provocation and my immature  mind   believed that my attitude  was  right and normal.  The first time I  tried to  bully a boy in my first week of grade school, the boy fought back  and I thought that   he would be  in trouble with the teacher for fighting back. Obviously I was the one in trouble and was punished by having to stand in the corner.  From that point I learned that the world wasn't like  home,  but I never  really changed my views, I simply adjusted  in regard to how and when I could physically express  them.

Today in the  U.S. divorce laws are well beyond what even I am comfortable with.  My  marriage as  I previously said was  open on my  end only  and  made  firm in the pre-nup.   So  i can't call  having  sexual freedom  outside of  the marriage  "cheating".                   

But if  it was a  conventional marriage  in most of the  states in the  U.S. I could  cheat  a thousand times  and get  custody of any  children we might have  and still get half of his assets plus  child support and  spousal  support (alimony) without consideration  of  my  actions. In several of those states he would be responsible to support those  children even if he wasn't the biological father.                   That  is crossing the line a bit even for me!

m2ichaela:                                                                                                 

The time I sat on his face until he passed out I had him  in bondage.     It was something I  often did during  sex because I didn't like   having him  touch me with his hands sometimes and I often enjoyed the  control of having him immobile and pretty much helpless.  It wasn't something he enjoyed but he  would submit to  in the hope of  having  coital  sex.

I should point out to those who choose to try smothering a man until he's unconscious that a  strong man  can often find a way to get some air even with an average size woman (or man) sitting on his face.       The affect is cumulative  and you might have to force his head back down and sit on his face  several times  until  the lack of  air makes him to  weak to  fight  you off.  Of course you could kill him that way  so you shouldn't sit on his face for more than a minute or so after he stops struggling.   Then you can  simply move down and sit on his chest and slap his face or something to bring him back.                          Every guy I did this with  started breathing a few seconds after I got off his face.  I suppose  if  the guy  you try this with is weak or you are a  plus size woman or a man, you might manage it without the bondage but you will still have to be cautious about how long you sit on him.