Ultimate shoulder rides

You are welcome. It is nice to be appreciated. Yes, these are videos I uploaded.  Your response  shows that it can be nice to see gals shoulder-carried like royalty without the gals being mean to those carrying or otherwise serving the gals.

Gals, if I ever shoulder carry you it will be this way except you always will be appreciative also. See how smart Grace Jones and Terry Nunn are? They showed appreciation and rewarded and reinforced desired behavior with hugs and kisses. Dogs get petted. Horses get petted, hugged, and kissed. Men get hugged, sometimes caressed with ladies' fingers through mens' hair,  and kissed. See the difference gals?

Stacy Westfall and many other ladies on youtube.com can ride and control horses very effectively without tools of pain-compliance such as bridles, bits, whips, or spurs  and you can do or learn to do the same when shoulder riding or otherwise controlling your men. You can not even use those tools on a killer whale and some gals effectively ride and rule killer whales too.  I am a human killer whale.  Some men are. These ladies make it a pleasure for all these creatures to carry the ladies at the ladies' pleasure and joy.

Tina, why do you not try the same? Maybe you will get more shoulder rides and have to pay less money. You would shoulder ride me no other way, even if I were your husband or not. Yes, being over weight limits your opportunities and being well proportioned apparently gets at least one gal more shoulder rides. But, you are not the only one on video or in photos that is over weight and shoulder riding too. Some participants on this website who identify themselves as guys have also claimed to shoulder carry over wieght women. Being single will not stop you from getting shoulder rides. Being married to a jealous spouse whom you hate to frighten or diplease will limit your shoulder riding opportunities.

Liz, you appear to be a kind appreciative shoulder ridress who tries to make it a pleasure to be shoulder carried without cruelty and you claim to get many shoulder rides. When is the last time you had to pay for a shoulder ride? Even some of our self-proclaimed masochists claim that they would love to be one of YOUR dear horses."

Last edited by namaegaaru (2009-03-22 18:06:29)

Yes, you must be sick of hearing what I write regarding my preferred riding style and you are the self-proclaimed masochist I am referring to.  I am still trying to influence new-comers. No, I never give up. Winston Churchill reportedly said, "Never give up. Ever, ever, ever."

You can be shoulder-ridden under bit, reins, and spurs in public. Just go to San Francisco, California, USA; not Riyad, Saudi Arabia.

Come to San Diego, California, USA near where I live, about 800 kilometers south of San Francisco  and you can be shoulder-ridden like a donkey or horse without bridle, reins, spurs, or whips. I believe you can be ridden under whip, spurs, bridle, and bit in San Diego too without being arrested or cited.

To each their own way. If I were a single woman with no lover to worry about, I would try to shoulder ride you like a horse or donkey without bit, bridles, whip, or spurs. If you were my husband we would occassionally do it nude, to climax.

Maybe you can refer somebody like you who is single with no lover to Tina.

With all due respect, mastadon, your reference to hitler is both irrelevant and pathetic. hitler wanted to dominate the world and exterminate opponents. He didn't want to be ridden by female riders. Killing innocent people was his main achievement, and it's not the same as dreaming that nice girls will wish ride on our shoulders. Insane hatred of jews, gay, gypsies was his credo, and that has nothing to see with the pleasure to have one'sneck wrapped by feminine thighs. Starting a war and be responsible of the death of 50 000 000 people is very far from requesting to be ridden and sweat under the weight, and for the pleasure, of a nice Woman. Your comparison is appaling.

I think you should apologize for such an insulting speech

Equidum

equidum wrote:

With all due respect, mastadon, your reference to hitler is both irrelevant and pathetic. hitler wanted to dominate the world and exterminate opponents. He didn't want to be ridden by female riders. Killing innocent people was his main achievement, and it's not the same as dreaming that nice girls will wish ride on our shoulders. Insane hatred of jews, gay, gypsies was his credo, and that has nothing to see with the pleasure to have one'sneck wrapped by feminine thighs. Starting a war and be responsible of the death of 50 000 000 people is very far from requesting to be ridden and sweat under the weight, and for the pleasure, of a nice Woman. Your comparison is appaling.

I think you should apologize for such an insulting speech

Equidum

Hitler was against anything which was different to his own strange opinion. Women were regarded in that system as absolutely inferior human beings only useful to give birth to children.
Hitler himself and all of those people around him were extremely strange and after my opinion mostly with a quite strange mental attitude.
The background of many leading people was nothing but extremely criminal.
In a normal society with normal rules they would not have had any chance.
Even their sexuality was mostly strange and the only thing that was uniting them that was a deep hatred against any other people and they were after my opinion the worst criminals we ever have seen in history.
And as we know, Hitler did not even love his own people- as often he confirmed. His own people was just a tool for his strange and sick ideas and as he failed he confirmed that he would give a damn to his own people he was abusing over years.
People of this type seem to me mentally sick and any kind of erotics or sexuality was extremely suspect to them.
After my opinion a page of darkest history in human history.
In the Nazi's world there was only a very inferior and very reduced place for women and any kind of sexuality.

I am glad my comments sparked a spark of life among the members-I was getting fedup with the same dreary old monologues,well done those who answered-try and keep it up.

As one who was bombed both with V1 and V2s I would agree with you. Long may he rot in hell.

Not under duress Sam.

I think most people fail to see that the Hitler-System was founded from the beginning to eliminate all other people who did not fit into their shape.
Being deviant in your outlook, maybe you were too smal or too weak or if your attitide was out of their shape, maybe you loved another type of music or even if you had a different outlook on life, this all could bring you in one of those many prison camps.
As we know, most of those leading persons in prison camps were indeed real criminals and before that regime anything else but respected.
Those young guys with their lomg hair and rotten clothes with a beer bottle in their hands would have been the very first prosoners in one f those camps.
The Nazis wanted to clean young people who were obeying to orders like soldiers and who spent their leisure time not in bars or discotheques but in exhausting military games  over the week-ends.
Young boys who only loved Jazz-music were sent into camps without any discussion.
All people had to march the same line and of course there were many young people who were really fed up with all those stupid military games and many would have preferred quite other things in their leisure time.
Reading the wrong book, havon the wrong attitutude to sexuality or just having the wrong opinion about life, all that could bring you into one of those camps.
Being in one of those camps, no judge and no court could ever help you, because the camps were based on the mere opinion of the police.
Individuality was a crime in any sense and all those who only were suspicious to think different had to be aware getting imprisonned at any time.
Sexuality did not exist and during the years of that system the Nazis had various actions where whole groups of certain parts of the people were brought into those camps where they were forseen as real slaves for that Nazi system.
Opponents or people who were onyl suspicious to be opponents had after the sick ideas the last right to toil for the ruling Nazis like slaves up to their death.
This way christian motivated young people were sent to the camps and the next action all young people like lesbians and homosexuals were sent there and so on.
And lazy young people who just were hanging around like many young people today they were sent at first into the camps for really enforced labour at 6 days a week over 12 and 14 hours.
The vast majority of Nazi leaders were before people from the lower middle-class and quite often from the social trash with very simple ideas of life and anything that wasout of their mind was regarded as dangerous.
Very very few of the Nazi leaders were successful before in their jobs or professions.
Hitler for example was nothing but a lazy guy hanging around like a hoboe without a job and without money being backed by the government and othe people. He never worked or had a job.
Goebbels was hanging around with his parents not working and living at the cost of his parents and Himmler was trying to breed a few chicken.
The Nazi leaders were anything else but positive examples. They were lazy, arrogant and real parasites and underdogs to the community of working people before they could rule.
In their simple point of view just according to the opinion of the lower class a women was regarded as completely inferior and therefore the Nazis wanted to have a woman at home, getting children and that was it.
Ponyplay or any other deviant sexual attitude was regarded as a perversion and perverted people came instantly into the camps.
Thousands of homosexuals were the first in those camps.
The life under the rule of the Nazis was not much pleasant and everybody who stepped out of their line- however it might have been- was regarded as a dangerous enemy of the system.
And the life of an inferior human being did not count at all from the very first day of their rule.
And it is absolutely wrong to think that most people were glad with that system. Especially many young people who were not much different to young people we have today did think different but a simple remark at the wrong time at the wrong place could bring you in the camp.
Sexuality did not exist at all in the public at those times, except the fact that women had to get as many children as possible. Sexuality as we like to understand toady was regarded as a deviant attitude with all consequences.
What the Nazi-leaders did that was their own business and they could do what they wanted and the Röhm-affair was a quite good chance to kill thousands of homosexuals or those who were only suspected to be homosexual because Röhm as the leader of the SA was obviously a homosexual and by this action thousands of other people who were inconvenient were liquidated.
In a few words: The Nazis only accepted "clean" sex between men and women and the only purpose of sexuality was getting children.
Any other kind of sexuality was regarded as a dangerous perversion which could bring bitter end mostly deadly consequences.

Equidum, I completely agree with you.
But please notice : At the last free elections in 1932 only! 33 % were voting for the Hitler-Party!!
And that means almost 70 % did not vote for Hitler.
So it is absolutely wrong that a majority stood behind Hitler.
You can check this fact in Wikipedia.
After overtaking the rule the first steps were to put all opponents into camps and newspapers came under strict control.
And from that day the only chance for the man in the street remained to agree or to arrive in a camp.
Those who could afford left the country.

I agree with you that nationalism and chauvinism belong to a time which has gone a long time ago. Today in modern europe these things seem to me just kinky and stupid.
But indeed the realationship between the nearest neighbours in europe (France/Germany) was much better years ago and at the moment I do not see that it will come better. Sarkozy is playing the full play of chauvinism which reminds me to a resurrection of Napoleon.
But we write the year 2009 and 1753 and it seems to that in Paris the upper class did not notice yet that we are in 2009 in the center of Europe after 3 wars between France and Germany and a period of more than 60 years of peace in Europe.

Nick is right and we're kind of hi-jacking this non political forum. I apologize to all... But we did it with very lofty ideas didn't we   ?

I will check that book, Nick, thanks for the info .... ( However, I saw last week a TV interview < On Arte channel > of a former SS captain called Hafner .... I suppose they are different people ?! ).

Frederik, I agree on the regrettable poor state of the franco german relation, and also that our little Napoleon Sarkozy is largely responsible for that ... Let's hope that the growing economic crisis will bring us all back on track !

It made an interesting interlude-perhaps we are not such fuddy-duddies after all.

Fuddy-duddy

You did not go to the right school-it is

A stuffy or foolishly old fashioned person-first appeared in Texas-The Galvaston Daily News in 1889.

I rembember it well.

If you are really in to this-there is a Fuddy Duddy Fudge made in Depoe Bay Oregon.
How about that.