Internet's #1 shoulder riding community
You are not logged in.
kindly share how you will feel as a rider..and how you will see a carrier
Offline
When I Ride On a pony I feel
I am some what superior and the guy under me ia some what inferior.
He is there to serve me..
I enjoys his movements between my legs and when his neck and head press on my shorts it feel great.
I.like to force him to carry me even if he is exhausted
Offline
STUDEKM:
You should feel superior because, at least when you're sitting on him, you are superior.
He acknowledges that by his willingness to bear your weight and take your directions, Or by being in a position that he is required to do so.
If you are sexually stimulated by your superior position, it's a mater of indifference because you're sitting up there for whatever enjoyment or purpose you might have and he's bearing your weight regardless of your feelings and also regardless of his.
Offline
I feel dominant and safe if the carrier is strong and motivated.
Offline
STUDEKM wrote:
When I Ride On a pony I feel
I am some what superior and the guy under me ia some what inferior.
He is there to serve me..
I enjoys his movements between my legs and when his neck and head press on my shorts it feel great.
I.like to force him to carry me even if he is exhausted
Nice..
Offline
Audreyb wrote:
STUDEKM:
You should feel superior because, at least when you're sitting on him, you are superior.
He acknowledges that by his willingness to bear your weight and take your directions, Or by being in a position that he is required to do so.
If you are sexually stimulated by your superior position, it's a mater of indifference because you're sitting up there for whatever enjoyment or purpose you might have and he's bearing your weight regardless of your feelings and also regardless of his.
You must be declared as the Queen of shoulder riding.... I wish every pony in this world must be given a chance to carry you...
Offline
Tom Booker wrote:
I feel dominant and safe if the carrier is strong and motivated.
Thanks cool
Offline
gilsllvae:
>You must be declared as the Queen of shoulder riding.... I wish every pony in this world must be given a chance to carry you<
I was simply acknowledging the obvious in the rider/carrier relationship.
I believe it covers the reality of it regardless of the gender, sexual orientation or the relationship outside of the rider and carrier portion of their lives.
A wife may ride her husband or the reverse for example and have a perfectly normal marriage and still have a superior vs inferior relationship when one is sitting on the other's shoulders.
They need not even regard the other's view. The rider may feel superior while the carrier may not see his/her position as inferior and may have his own motives.
Yet their respective position do in fact demonstrate a superior/inferior status.
The beast of burden must be considered inferior to the one sitting on him whether the beast of burden is an animal or human. If I were to sit on a donkey for example, the donkey's opinion or motivation would be a matter of complete indifference to me.
Please understand that I'm not contending that the carrier is invariably inferior as a person. Only that he must be viewed as inferior to the one sitting on him during the ride.
Offline
Audreyb wrote:
gilsllvae:
>You must be declared as the Queen of shoulder riding.... I wish every pony in this world must be given a chance to carry you<
I was simply acknowledging the obvious in the rider/carrier relationship.
I believe it covers the reality of it regardless of the gender, sexual orientation or the relationship outside of the rider and carrier portion of their lives.
A wife may ride her husband or the reverse for example and have a perfectly normal marriage and still have a superior vs inferior relationship when one is sitting on the other's shoulders.
They need not even regard the other's view. The rider may feel superior while the carrier may not see his/her position as inferior and may have his own motives.
Yet their respective position do in fact demonstrate a superior/inferior status.
The beast of burden must be considered inferior to the one sitting on him whether the beast of burden is an animal or human. If I were to sit on a donkey for example, the donkey's opinion or motivation would be a matter of complete indifference to me.
Please understand that I'm not contending that the carrier is invariably inferior as a person. Only that he must be viewed as inferior to the one sitting on him during the ride.
Ok mam... understood your view..
Offline
Pages: 1