Ultimate shoulder rides

Thanks for the comment Equidum.

Agreed, muscle is the week point of our partners. But this doesn’t qualify them to become riders. Or muscle being strong point of a male doesn’t mean he has to be the mount.

First I will take the muscle issue.

In the Stone-Age may be the physical strength can decide who the rider should be (I mean the stronger would have the power to decide who he wants to be – a rider or mount). Then centuries back, the person with higher social status could decide the things. In today’s modern era, all are equal, so an individual can decide for himself, what he wants to be.

Now the gender issue.

Again it’s the choice of individual. A man should not opt to become a mount just because he has more muscle. It should be due to his liking. And if a female likes to give rides, should she opt to ride just because she has less muscle?

So i dont think this can be one more good reason to promote WoM.

My knowledge, understanding or experience about the topic is way lower than yours. This was just a view.

So your opinions would be really more valuable than mine. So please do express your reaction about all this.

Thanks again.

I agree with your comments, Lovetoride. My point was that it was more logical, and efficient, to use a muscled person to achieve goals requiring muscle. But I was a bit carried away by my belief on Female superiority ....

lovetoride wrote:

Thanks for the comment Equidum.

Agreed, muscle is the week point of our partners. But this doesn’t qualify them to become riders. Or muscle being strong point of a male doesn’t mean he has to be the mount.

First I will take the muscle issue.

In the Stone-Age may be the physical strength can decide who the rider should be (I mean the stronger would have the power to decide who he wants to be – a rider or mount). Then centuries back, the person with higher social status could decide the things. In today’s modern era, all are equal, so an individual can decide for himself, what he wants to be.

Now the gender issue.

Again it’s the choice of individual. A man should not opt to become a mount just because he has more muscle. It should be due to his liking. And if a female likes to give rides, should she opt to ride just because she has less muscle?

So i dont think this can be one more good reason to promote WoM.

My knowledge, understanding or experience about the topic is way lower than yours. This was just a view.

So your opinions would be really more valuable than mine. So please do express your reaction about all this.

Thanks again.

Thanks for agreeing Equidum.

lovetoride:

I agree that the strength of the  rider  and  the carrier shouldn't be  the only  factor,  and it's far more common  for  the  rider to be  female and the carrier to be  male, I  believe that  the strength of  the mind/personality of those involved is the determining factor. A  small  woman can  control a strong  man   and a  weaker man can  control  a  physically strong woman.   

I  couldn't carry a  man and wouldn't even if I  could. But this  is not to say that I see your choice  as wrong. Since you  like to  sit  on her and she submits  to this desire, you  obviously have the superior strength of will which is  much more important than the strength of  muscles.

However, unless  you only enjoy  sitting on her shoulders, I have some  difficulty in  understanding why  you would choose to  sit on her shoulders in  a  stationary  position  and without being carried.
She  could  probably endure your  weight  if you  sat on her back  while she was  on her hands and knees  for  a  much longer  time  and of  course  you  could simply  have her lay on  the sofa and sit on her stomach or her chest and be comfortable while the sofa supported  your  weight more.
She  might have  some trouble  with your  weight on her   but  it would  save her back  for when you wanted to be carried.  If  you prefer sitting astride her, you  could put her on the  floor and sit astride her  that way,  with  your weight  keeping her in  place but without  the strain on her neck and  back.
You  would  also have more  option  of  position  to  sit on her  comfortably and  much  longer  with  more of her body supporting your  buttocks .

Great históry, i love it! congratulation, I d like to know how old is she? how old are you? she is blonde? short hair or long? she said how she felt?
your fan thank you very much!

Dear Anonymous
Thanks for your appreciation.

She was around 23 years old. I was around 25.
She had dark hairs (not blonde). She has long hair, so I had to put it in front while sitting on her shoulders.

No she didn't say how she felt, nor did I ask. Because she knew well, that I like to sit on her. She took it as my childishness. I still planned to sit on her regardless of what she felt, so there was not point in asking. She knew it too, so she knew there was not point of telling. And she didn't consider it as a matter that is serious enough for having a discussion.

These things were spontaneous for me as well as her. Discussing about it to her would have killed all the fun. But if you are really interested to know.... she was not into giving rides or riding.