Ultimate shoulder rides

gunde wrote:

The wow pic didn´t feature a shoulder ride, so I had to delete it.

looked clear to me that she was getting on top of the other girl.

gunde wrote:

bdm wrote:

gunde wrote:

The wow pic didn´t feature a shoulder ride, so I had to delete it.

looked clear to me that she was getting on top of the other girl.

She was standing behind the other girl, who was sitting. Her right thigh was only touching the sitting girls shoulder. She was by no means about to mount the sitting girl.

well i disagree. 
by the way you have described my posted pic...... that it was by no means a ''wow'' picture in your opinion.
i would ask you then why there are similar pics on here just like the the one that i posted?

if you would like some examples i will post the links to those questionable pics then i will ask why you havent deleted them aswell?
members such as myself see them as an example of the subject at hand and therfore as an example of what we can post when others have already done so.

i dont want to single out other members contributions or deter them as you have done here in my case but im willing to make my point if requested.

gunde wrote:

We could probably argue an entire day about, what is a shoulder ride and what isn´t.

I only call it a shoulder ride, if the lifter is standing on two feet (or one). If the lifter is sitting down, then the liftees feet must be off the floor. If the liftees feet are on the floor, then the entire weight of the liftee isn´t carried by the lifter and it no longer is a shoulder ride.

I either delete every pic with the lifter seated and the liftees feet touching the ground from the bonus albums or move them to the public albums. What I do depends on how much time I have. This is a shoulder riding site. There is a thread, where we have discussed, what can be called a shoulder ride.

If you want to reupload the pic, feel free to do it. Members can then decide, if they like it or not. To me that was only a pic of one girl standing behind another girl.

Arguing?  please dont start that bs Gunde,  i am just making a point.
I dont appreciate that after being a member here since 2006, and then being gone for a year and then coming back and trying to contribute with fresh non previously posted material. i dont appreciate the feeling of being picked on, thats all, especially when i could go through this forum and find numerous questionable posts! frankly i dont feel that i should have to just to make this point.

i can upload it again if you like? but i dont really care to at this point, matter of fact you kinda took the 'wind outta my sails'' on finding new material to post here.  but for now ill give you one recent example of a pic, like the pic which is in question, it has all the fine points that you made in regards to mine ''not being a shoulder ride''

http://www.ultimateshoulderrides.com/forum    - what do you call this huh!? looks like a woman behind another woman. not quite a shoulder ride by your standards

i apologize to agdeakin for using his contribution. but this pic is no different than mine! its like an '' almost shoulder ride'' for lack of better words.
agdeakin is a great contributor, ive seen many great posts from him, as so are your contributuions gunde! both of you always post new unseen material which i very much appreciate.

but......... if your going to be so diligent about ''what is'' and ''what isnt'' then you have quite a few other posts to to investigate and possibly delete that you maybe have missed......  also with all that diligence you would then likly delete the many reposts that occur even sometimes within 24 hours of the same pics or vids being reposted....... because   unfortunatly some people arent up to date on whats already been posted here... over an over again and again through out the years!

if  everybody took that attitude here our usable material would likly go down and be very little per week and  that means very few member contributions and user activity within the comunity.
with very little new posted material on the internet on a daily basis  i dont think we should be so picky unless it is offensive or just obviously wrong.

i could point out some so called ''3 & 4 high'' pics aswell.  there are some in those albums that are clealry people on the bottom that either on the ground etc and not really part of a true ''3 & 4 high'' picture. they simply are postioned between the carriers legs.
whatver.... i think ive made my point